Brave Giovannina e Silvia che hanno lavorato sulla romanistica tedesca nineteenth century. Eleonora good for reading this long article de Robilant. It 'a text which seeks to export to America a bit' of the complex relationship between history and law that existed for us in Europe. But inevitably to simplify a bit 'too much. Serena also good, but it did confuse the two Kantorowicz: Ernst Hermann was a historian and a lawyer, even if both were a lot of history and law. Hermann found a pamphlet founder of the doctrine of free standing, written by and posted under a pseudonym. But at the same time took care of legal philology, and also wrote a seminal article on the manuscript tradition of the Digest. In the same years in which to develop the doctrine of the right free from the manuscripts published a treatise on medieval criminal law, that of Alberto Gandini (see Cortese), which consists of a series of Quaestiones. But do you think there is a relationship between these two activities that seem so different, that of editor of medieval texts and the philosophy of law? What has the reconstruction of the texts of the past with the design of a law of the future? Ulrich Hermann Kntorowicz was a genius, he was schizophrenic or was a member of a rich culture?
0 comments:
Post a Comment